NAP homepage

Latest NAPNT news Latest NT drug news About NAP Current campaign Media alerts
Events NAP in the media Health info
for drug users
Images Search napnt.org Site map
Contact NAP

NAP email list Articles Donate Links Retractable
syringes


The NT Parliamentary 'Invasion' Chronicles
- As reported on www.melbourne.indymedia.org -

by mick lambe

 

 

NT Parliament invasion update
by mick lambe - Mar 5 '03


There was a media 'event' at the NAP HQ earlier tonight, but we begged off -- Court is tiring.

Court - We allowed two Police witnesses to retire, after it became clear that the Court conceded our version of events at NAP/PARIAH events.

And the Police seem unable to remember anything of import :-) A case of "I was only following orders - I think."

This meant that Superintendent Bert Hofer was available for cross-examination after the lunch adjournment.

Hofer is the person who kicked a female activist, on the floor of Parliament during the so-called 'invasion'.

Superintendent Hofer

He also dragged Gary Meyerhoff from the Speaker's chair in an unnecessarily brutal manner.

Gary was just sitting in a chair.

Besides myself, Rebecca Morse an ABC journalist also witnessed Hofer kicking Emma.

We both informed Emma of Hofer's assault separately, shortly after we'd left the Parliament building.

The doctoring of the tape by NT Police, shows a close-up of a person's hand during two separate assaults on Ema.

This creative (if obvious) zooming-in, conceals Hofer's cowardly and thuggish behaviour.

What makes this assault and cover-up worse, is the unrelenting pressure put on Emma (who faces 16 nuisance charges) by NT Police.

I don't mean to be repetitive - but it's important to set the scene for today's Court performance.
________________________________________

As Gary had summoned the witnesses - he led the questioning. He concentrated on the assault against himself by Hofer. Hofer was fairly relaxed as the video evidence was background and obscured by people moving about.

Gary accused Hofer of pulling him by his hair and throwing him down the steps. It's not disputed that Gary was thrown down the steps for chair-sitting.

Hofer conceded he might have 'inadvertently' grabbed some of Gary's hair when dragging him out of the Sacred White Throne.

Ema went up next to cross-examine. She was calm and asked Hofer questions about the assault against her - which he categorically denied, despite the evidence of two witnesses.

Surprise, surprise.

Ema then led Hofer through some questions about investigatory procedure.

Hofer conceded that it was not normal practice to dismiss an investigation without interviewing any of the witnesses. As had happened with Emma's assault charge against him.

(Ema was only told of her charge being dropped by Gary, just before HER Hearing. The Court separated Emma from her Co-defendants (no-one else has been treated in this manner) to face an assault charge manufactured to punish her. Hofer was in Court that day to gloat over Ema's predicament. She asked for his removal on grounds of intimidation. The Court used another reason to achieve that effect)

I was just getting angrier and angrier as this brutal pig sat there telling barefaced lies.

I wanted to see the angry face I saw in Parliament, as Hofer kicked the young woman now questioning him politely, as she fended off the usual attempts by the Police Prosecutor to disrupt her flow and concentration.

Then it was my turn to cross-examine.

The first question often sets the tone for the following questions.

So it's important to choose ones words carefully.

"I SAW YOU KICK A HELPLESS YOUNG WOMAN IN PARLIAMENT - WANT TO CALL ME A LIAR MOTHERFUCKER?!"

After the "Mr Lambe! - Mr Lambe! from the bench had subsided (a blatant attempt to disrupt my flow :-) I modified my questioning style to avoid further interruptions.

Despite people going on about irrelevancies, I managed to get a part of the video shown that pictured me pointing at Hofer, as I regaled some MP about Hofer's assault on Emma.

I consider this new evidence in a serious assault case that was dropped without any investigation or interviews of the witnesses.

A case dropped despite the Police having in their possession, a video that showed Hofer kicking Emma, prior to them doctoring it.

Best was Superintendent Bert Hofer's face.

The one I remembered in Parliament, as he kicked a defenceless young woman.

 

 

Some items and an article on that Parliamentary 'Invasion'
by mick lambe

Mar 9 '03

Hi people

We've been catching up on food and sleep the last two days. I just haven't had time to write lately. I'll do a piece on our cross-examination of Denis Burke, Sue Carter, etc... when I do. Very interesting.
______________________________

In my reply to Meredith's excellent piece below - is more information.

------------------------

I gave two interviews for television on Thursday - both were aired and also showed footage of me being attacked by NT Police.

As I've already pointed out here - we were too tired (and busy) to attend the 7-30 Report 'media event' and I haven't seen it as we don't have a TV.

I prefer independent media, despite knowing most of the journo's and news crew in the NT - They admit that racism is not a topic they are encouraged to cover :-) See: The De vine tragedy

My interviews were both rebuttals to the accusation from Kon Vatskalis Labor Minister that our action was a "fascist" one.

I simply pointed out the destruction of my home and the Police attacks NAP and PARIAH have suffered - and finished with - If our action was fascistic - "...what on Earth have I been through?"

I had asked Kon (who seemed a reasonable person) under cross-examination, if he knew why I had entered Parliament? He admitted he did not know.

Another of the PARIAH mob, Ema - asked the same question with the same result.
__________________________________________

14 May 2002

"She did a great interview as well. Making the point that human rights in the NT (not drugs) are the main issues."

mick lambe

http://www.napnt.org/pages/Articles_10.htm
__________________________________________

Given that I've produced all of NAP's legal arguments (up until recently) built their web site and written most of their articles, I do not take kindly to attempts by the media to publicise their own simplistic agenda.
____________________________

Gary Meyerhoff has recognised this tactic by the Police, Courts and media and introduced the Network aspect of NAP more forcefully into evidence, as PARIAH have done from the beginning.
____________________________

Court on Monday for yet another Police nuisance charge.

A NAP and PARIAH member face charges for painting slogans on an old billboard that was already covered in graffiti.

It was immediately repainted (first time in 10(?)years) and a complaint from the owner solicited by NT Police to attempt to justify this blatant discrimination.

As Police did regarding the heinous charges of bill-posting.

I'll be going along for support and legal assistance.

 

 

 

Consequences of political activism and questions that need answering

by meredith Delandelles <mdelandelles@wchcs.tas.gov.au> wrote:


My name is Meredith de Landelles, formerly of Darwin in the Northern Territory, but now residing in Zeehan on the West Coast of Tasmania. I am employed as the Youth Health Worker on the West Coast of Tasmania.

On Wednesday the 5th of March 2003 my fiancé, Scott White, was arrested for extradition to the Northern Territory from Tasmania to face charges relating to protest activities.

Extradition is usually reserved for perpetrators of violent crimes such as murder or rape, yet Scott was extradited for (allegedly) disturbing the legislative assembly during a protest against the Northern Territory Labor Government’s draconian Drug House Legislation and other lesser charges including a completely false charge of damaging business premises.

Scott and I are now living in Tasmania. We did not in any way try to pervert the course of justice by leaving the Northern Territory. I had applied for a job in January of 2002 (well before any Network Against Prohibition actions had taken place) on the West Coast of Tasmania and in July 2002 I had an interview for that job and decided to accept the position.

The reasons for this were many and varied, but the most important of these was the quality of life of our child. Scott and I did not believe the Northern Territory would enable her to grow up with the right for thoughts of her own without persecution.

After arriving in Tasmania, Scott called the Police Prosecutions department of the Northern Territory Police to inform them of our whereabouts. The Northern Territory Police has been in possession of our address and phone numbers since October 2002. Scott told them during that conversation that we had little money for legal representation and the Northern Territory Legal Aid had told him they would not represent him unless he pleaded guilty, which he was not going to do.

He told the Police Prosecutions department that he wanted some time to study legal process to enable him to defend himself competently. Scott freely gave them our address and phone numbers at that time.

After Scott was remanded into the custody of Sergeant Hockings of the Northern Territory Police I asked the Sergeant why they didn’t call us to inform us of a new court date so he could get there himself rather than go through the humiliation of an extradition. We live in a very small community where he holds the position of Coordinator at the local Community Centre. Sergeant Hockings said, in a derogatory tone, "Oh he wouldn’t have shown up".

I told him that I am Scott’s partner and know him better than anyone and know what that he would indeed have presented to court under his own steam if given the opportunity. A simple $2 phone call would have saved the Northern Territory Tax Payers thousands of dollars in extradition costs.

If he then did not appear before the Magistrate extradition proceedings may have been justified.

We have a child, Ellienne (9), and two foster children (aged 15 & 18) living with us who look up to him as a father figure and as a positive male role model. This has been most distressing for them considering the minor charges for which he was taken into custody. The behavioural or emotional challenges associated with young people who have experienced traumatic events and are in foster care should be self evident.

Stability and certainty in their life and the world around them is imperative if any effective intervention and positive change is going to be achieved.

Extraditing Scott has been totally destabilising for the entire family and my child and foster children are displaying extreme mood swings and outbursts of aggression and depression since being told of the situation.

They all insisted on attending the extradition hearing to show support and family unity.

Scott also has a job as the coordinator of the Zeehan Neighbourhood Centre, is president of the Police and Citizens Youth Club in Zeehan, and plays an important role in building community capacity within the local area. He takes an active role in community events and activities, and is a positive male role model for some of the most disadvantaged youth in the area.

His current employer has advised that his employment is not in jeopardy and he is fully supported by the Zeehan Neighbourhood Centre Inc. His employer was aware of his status with the Northern Territory Police before he was extradited.

It may appear to some that we moved for Scott to escape persecution from theNorthern Territory Police for protest activities of which we were both involved, yet if this was the case we certainly wouldn’t be attending protests here in Tasmania which we have done on many occasions given the abhorrent situation brewing in the Middle East and the continuing inhumane treatment of refugees by the Australian Government.

It is my understanding that we live in a democracy and that freedom of speech and the right to protest are fundamentals of a democracy. So is the right to information. I would like explanations for the following:

1. Why did the Northern Territory Police extradite Scott White to the Northern Territory for charges related to protest activities which are fundamental rights in a democracy?

2. Why does it appear as though Sargent Hockings lied in the witness boxwhen Scott was given the opportunity to ask him questions during the
extradition hearing? When Scott asked him why he had not been issued with a summons to answer the charges, Sargent Hockings stated that all attempts to locate Scott White had proved fruitless. This is a lie as Scott had called the Northern Territory Police Prosecutions to give them our new residential details in October 2002.

3. How could someone who is contributing to his local community to the extent that Scott is here on the West Coast of Tasmania, be extradited for such minor offences?

4. How could someone who has a fiancé, child and two foster children, stable employment, and no previous convictions for any offences be extradited for such minor offences?

5. How can freedom of speech and the right to protest not be fundamental rights in the Northern Territory as they should be in any democracy?

6. How can the Northern Territory Government justify spending Tax Payer dollars on such an expensive extradition procedure when there were much less expensive alternatives that could have at least been attempted first.?

7. Why does it appear that this is a politically motivated decision by a struggling Northern Territory Labor Government?

8. Why did the Northern Territory Government feel that it was appropriate to extradite Scott three days before his birthday (11th of March) which was clearly printed on the warrants for his arrested? This is cruel and unusual punishment which has devastated our family and the particular need we have for stability for the foster children we have taken in voluntarily. To add to the devastation we are feeling, my birthday was the day after the extradition (9th of March).

9. Why is the Northern Territory Government so threatened by a non violent protest group?

10. When will I, and the other members of our family here in Tasmania, be able to see Scott again? Will he be able to come back to live and work with us in our community while awaiting his court appearances? Does the Government of the Northern Territory intend for Scott to lose his employment and destabilise the lives of young Australians as punishment for disagreeing with their draconian and inhumane drug house legislation.

11. Why didn’t the Tasmanian Magistrates Court overturn such a ridiculous and obviously politically motivated extradition?

12. Why was Scott unable to complete his statement during his extradition hearing? He was told by Magistrate Tim Hill that he did not want to hear a political statement. As this was directly related to the extradition charges it should have been admissible and taken into consideration.

13. A CIB detective with the Tasmanian Police told me any contact with Scott was at Sargent Hockings discretion and I had to be nice to him if we wanted to be able say goodbye to Scott. Why did I have to "be nice" to Sargent Hockings so I, and my children, could spend some time with Scott before he was sent to Darwin? I would have thought that would be a basic human right. Why did my 9 year old daughter need to be searched before she saw him? I feel that is a total invasion of her rights as a child and of my right as a parent to keep my child safe.

I believe detailed explanations to the above queries would make it easier for me to accept this situation and explain it to my child and foster children.

I fear that we do not live in the democracy we think we do. I don’t believe that any of the actions taken against non violent protesters in the Northern Territory were warranted, nor do I believe an extradition is warranted for these offences. I too have been arrested in the Northern Territory for protest activities. In my situation I was sitting on a box watching other people engage in protest activities at a tent embassy outside Parliament House in Darwin. I was asked to leave and I explained to the officers on numerous occasions that I was only watching and not participating in any way, and that I had the permission of an aboriginal elder of the Larrakeyah people, the traditional owners of the land, to be there.

I was then dragged along the grass painfully while I was telling them I had to walk slowly because of a tropical ulcer on my foot which they broke open due to their excessively rough handling. My ulcer breaking open and coming into contact with the bare ground was quite dangerous due to a soil disease prevalent in Darwin which is lethal. As I had kept asking the police to slow down, told them the reason why and they didn’t, I believe they intentionally put me at risk of the soil disease.

I was grabbed by the throat and pushed into the back of a police van when I asked if I could make sure my 9 year old daughter was with her partner and could get home safely. I was put into the cells at Berrimah Police Station for 3 ½ hours and was not allowed to change my tampon in privacy (and I therefore refused to change it and I was put at
risk of toxic shock syndrome by the Northern Territory Police Force).

All this for sitting on a box and watching protest activity. Will I be extradited as well?

We are a normal family with kids, pets, schools, jobs and a mortgage. We try to have as small an impact on our environment as we can and live with an environmental conscience. We both work in the community welfare system and believe that human rights and social justice are the basis of a equitable society, and working in the welfare system only strengthens our beliefs. We stand up for what we believe is wrong. Should we, and the children who live with us, suffer for this?

I fear for Scott’s safety in the Northern Territory. I fear persecution and violence may be perpetrated against Scott in the hands of the Northern Territory Police Force. This is a very distressing period for our family and I would appreciate a response as soon as possible so we can start getting our lives into perspective once again. Please help us to understand how what has happened fits into the just and democratic society we are told we live in - that we want to live in.

Sincerely

____________________________________

Meredith de Landelles
Youth Health Worker
West Coast Health & Community Services
Phone: 0364735123
Mobile: 0419551656
Fax: 0364735125

 

 

 

Reply from mick

Meredith

Yes. The Northern Territory Police have proved to be entirely discriminatory in their treatment of NAP and PARIAH activists. They have also pushed the line that Scott is a fugitive from justice - to the Courts.

I believe the Court Clerk (present throughout our trial and in charge of evidence such as the Police-doctored Pariamentary video tape) spoke to Scott's father telling him, we had implied Scott was the "ringleader".

You can imagine the difficulties we've had explaining autonomy and individual choice to the Court - A classic hierarchical institution. The Narangba activists faced the same process of educating these political and philosophical luddites.

I raised the issue of the Court Clerk's conversation with Scott's Father in Court, but was told it was not illegal - although I believe the Magistrate conceded it to be inappropriate.

As you know, the Police attack at the first Smoke-in was declared to have no basis in law by the NT Ombudsman and charges against myself and Gary Meyerhoff were dropped. Charges relating to a protest outside the Justice building (where people were also arrested and imprisoned) were also dropped.

On Friday (7 March, 2003) Gary Meyerhoff was found innocent of one of the 35 nuisance charges of bill posting we have yet to face.

I also challenged (and had withdrawn) bail conditions that prevented me from attending political events.

So it's clear that these arrests, imprisonments and democratic infringements are politically motivated to cause us harm and complicate our legal defences.

My recent evidence of Police harassment by the NT Police during the PARIAH campaign (that saw my home destroyed after Territory and Federal attempts to remove me failed) has not been challenged in fact. As usual.

The NT Police seem to be an independent paramilitary force - given the claims by NT Attorney General, Peter Toyne and (then) NT Police Minister, Syd Stirling, that they have never spoken to NT Police about NAP.

Syd denied even hearing about the NAP smoke-ins that were attacked by NT Police - despite the publicity surrounding these events.

Syd's remarkable reticence in Court was totally inappropriate for a member of a supposedly responsible government. He came across like an 'old lag' rather than a Member of Parliament.

We sympathise with your suffering at the hands of the NT Police. They love to publicly denigrate people and erode the credibility of activists with nuisance charges and false arrests.

Emma was very concerned about your daughter's state of mind, during your violent arrest outside Parliament at the Tent Embassy. A pointless and callous use of Police power.

I've no answers to this Meredith, I just refuse to be silenced whatever the cost. You'll remember I went out bush and built a home five miles from my nearest neighbours - the Aboriginal people at Belyuen - to escape politics.

The Police wouldn't even allow you to respond to these charges with dignity - even from Tasmania. They have a deep abiding hatred of oppositional thought wherever it manifests itself.

They limit our options - but ever will we respond with...

Love and Rage

Take care mate and give our warmest regards to the kids. Scott will be OK, he's been through this NT Police persecution before.

Solidarity

mick lambe
Coordinator PARIAH
People Against Racism In Aboriginal Homelands

 

 

 

Posted: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:09 ACST

by mick lambe

Cross-examination continues for Burke

Northern Territory's Opposition leader Denis Burke will finish being cross-examined in the Darwin Magistrates Court today by members of the Network Against Prohibition.

The five activists are defending themselves against charges of disturbing the Legislative Assembly which stem from a protest they staged in the Parliamentary chamber last year.

The charges carry a maximum penalty of three years in prison.

Shadow Health Minister Sue Carter is expected to testify after Mr Burke.

ABC News Online
______________________________

Posted: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 8:01 ACST

Darwin looks to limit itinerant numbers

Darwin's Lord Mayor Peter Adamson says drastic measures are needed to curb itinerant numbers.

A Darwin City Council alderman has suggested a permit system for all itinerants coming to the city as a way of tackling crime and forcing them to return home after major events.

Mr Adamson says the itinerant issue is more widespread in Darwin than anywhere else in Australia and he will consider the permit proposal.

"Permits obviously work with the non-Indigenous population having to move out onto Aboriginal communities where they have received those rights under the Land Rights Act," he said.

"Whether it's possible to do it the other way under law is... debatable, but I certainly believe... it is worth exploring."

ABC News Online
----------------------------------------------

Peter Adamson is a former CLP politician. He was present (as were a host of other 'prominent' Darwinites) when Police attacked the sixth Smoke-in here.

It was a total set-up.

Racist as ...
_______________________________________________________


"Mr Adamson says the itinerant issue is more widespread in Darwin than anywhere else in Australia and he will consider the permit proposal."

---------------------------------------

(mick) - Yeah - we didn't get up here quickly enough before genocide became more subtle.

_______________________________________

They know not what they do :-)

Racist-proposal

Solidarity

 

 

 

The Northern Territory - home of the KKKeystone Kops
NT Police bias exposed by Courts
by mick lambe
Wed Mar 12 '03

(Facts related by Gary Meyerhoff)

As explained in an earlier report - Magistrate Wallace not only conceded our belief - that NT Police were engaged in a campaign of "nuisance charges" to complicate our lives and hinder our legal defence(s) - but also declared they were unlikely to cease.

This belief has gained futher weight, as frivolous charges by the NT Police continue to be dismissed by the Courts.

Gary Meyerhoff was recently inconvenienced by Police, in a matter relating to the alleged "unlawful damage" caused by a poster.

The charge was dismissed.

Only 30 or so more of these bill-posting charges to wade through. - Update - All dismissed.
____________________________________

Police seize Parliamentary Petitions

On Monday (10 March, 2003) a ridiculous charge of "indecent behaviour" was pursued by the NT Police. This was an incident where Police not only confiscated (allegedly) indecent posters in Raintree Park, but also Parliamentary petitions opposed to the absurd drug laws introduced by the NT Labor Government.

Police were relying on - IRIS WURRAMURA and STEVEN GEORGE PREGELJ v. COLIN FREDERICK GEORGE HAYMON Nos. 75 and 76 of 1987 Statute (1987) 44 NTR 1 - as a precedent in this case.

http://www.nt.gov.au/ntsc/doc/sentencing_remarks/0/87/0/NS000240.htm

Obviously a couple engaged in sex near a public laneway, was seen by the Police as being relevant to an art poster depicting a 3mm jockstrap-covered penis.
________________________________________

Censorship and drugs

The wowserism of the USA's Attorney General, Ashcroft regarding naked statues and this bizarre condemnation of an art poster by NT Police are undoubtably linked to said parties enthusiasm for the 'drug war'.

Despite emotional pleas by the Police Prosecutor, "I'm a Mother" (to which Magistrate Gilles replied, "I'm a Father") in some bid to lend credence to the alleged disgust the posters aroused. The charge was essentially laughed out of Court.

Magistrate (and Father) Gilles, considered himself a "reasonable person" who was not disgusted by the depiction (on an art poster) of a 3mm jockstrap-covered penis.

The pictures of Police exercising their - 'artistically mooted' - sexual preferences (complete with their names and numbers) were obviously seen as mere artistic irreverence, by the magistrate.

The only witnesses Police could muster to express disgust at the posters - were Police.

The Magistrate was not entirely enthralled by their evidence, cutting them off as soon as it became obvious they had nothing relevant to say.

Gary did not have a chance to ask the Police witnesses pertinent questions about their sexuality and levels of sexual experience, before the Magistrate dismissed the charge.
______________________________

NT Police fatten on Public Trough


In fact the only 'disgust' the Magistrate registered was towards a recent advertisement for a Police Media Liaison Officer at a salary of $130,000 per annum. The Magistrate felt the money would be better spent on two more Police officers, instead of being used to "dust off" Police before they appeared in Court.

Obviously the Magistrate's 'disgust' at the unprofessional conduct of the NT Police in bringing forth such a lame charge - goes without saying.

Magistrate Gilles even attempted to explain the concept of "free speech" to a mystified NT Police audience.

More grist for our Parliamentary 'Invasion' defence mill.

The media were kind enough to cover up this embarassing legal loss by the NT Police.
_______________________
_______________________

I will (given my undisputed expertise in this field) be applying for the position of NT Police Media Liaison Officer.

Next Article

Previous Article

 

NAP homepage

Latest NAPNT news Latest NT drug news About NAP Current campaign Media alerts
Events NAP in the media Health info
for drug users
Images Search napnt.org Site map
Contact NAP

NAP email list Articles Donate Links Retractable
syringes


AIVL


map06_23.gif

PARIAH