NAP homepage

Latest NAPNT news Latest NT drug news About NAP Current campaign Media alerts
Events NAP in the media Health info
for drug users
Images Search napnt.org Site map
Contact NAP

NAP email list Articles Donate Links Retractable
syringes

 


Background image and some articles from Sydney Indymedia

 

S11 Paranoia

 

Keeping the peace or keeping people down?

By Jude McCulloch

Protesters will be out in force at the upcoming meeting of the WTO in Sydney, and so too will police. While the rhetoric surrounding policing focuses on protecting citizens and keeping the peace, the reality is that the main role of police is protecting privilege and power by keeping people down.

This has been true from the early days of colonisation when the first police worked with the military to overcome indigenous resistance to occupation, to the first year of the new millennium when paramilitary police used batons and horses to overwhelm protesters at the World Economic Forum at Melbourne's Crown Casino.

While the fundamentals of the police role remain the same, police tactics adapt to the contemporary social environment and changing technologies. A 'hearts and minds' campaign against protesters is an important part of the modern day police strategy. In the lead up to the protests the police 'aided by a conservative and compliant media' will vilify protesters in order to create a climate that attempts to justify any future violence against them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is likely that in the context on the 'war on terror' coverage will be manipulated to suggest that protesters are potential terrorists. If police use violence against protesters it is likely that media camera people and individual protesters attempting to record visual images of police violence will be deliberately targeted to minimise coverage.

Police understand that while they can manage the media they can't control it. Images of police using violence are inherently newsworthy. Police talking heads arguing that only minimum force was used against violent protesters are negated by images of heavily protected police using horses and wielding batons against passive, non resisting, outnumbered, and sometimes visibly injured protesters. A picture paints a thousand words: cameras are important.

 


NIKE protest

 

 

Police tactics at protest events like those planned against the WTO have moved away from a law enforcement strategy aimed at arresting individual law breakers towards a more paramilitary style of policing aimed at using overwhelming force against groups of people thought of as the enemy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Legal support groups at the WEF in Melbourne were organised to deal with mass arrests. Ultimately very few people were arrested and very few charged. Instead police used batons, horses and sheer numbers to overwhelm people blockading Crown Casino. These tactics are of dubious legality and expose individual police to the risk of being sued.

Police mindful of this risk are likely to remove identifying nametags. This tactic combined with riot helmets makes the identification of individual police officers difficult, which in turn makes the pursuit of legal action by injured protesters more difficult.

Police are very aware of the risk of being sued in the face of evidence of use of excessive force and this may have a restraining effect on police tactics, particularly if they believe that the protesters have a well organised legal strategy and are capable of making and independent record of events. Again cameras are important.

While police will be at pains to minimise evidence of their own behaviour and identities, protesters should assume that their actions and identities are being recorded. Police have advanced technologies that make this possible and will also infiltrate or attempt to infiltrate the various groups involved in the protest action.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A relatively new weapon at the disposal of police is capsicum spray. Originally the introduction of this weapon was justified on the basis that it would be used as an alternative to firearms. However, it is clear that police see capsicum spray as a valuable tool against mass protests.

Police had this weapon on standby at the WEF in Melbourne in 2000, but it wasn't used. In the event that police are outnumbered or outmanoeuvred by protesters it provides a method for clearing people from an area. Protesters should familiarise themselves with ways to protect themselves from the effects of the spray and basic first aid for those affected.

Recent changes to the Defence Act make it easier for the government to call out the troops to aid police at protests. If such a call out is contemplated it is likely that great pains will be taken in constructing the demonstrators as dangerous terrorists.

Finally, to avoid confrontation and to undermine the effectiveness of planned protests police may attempt to keep protesters physically remote from the site of the WTO meeting.

Jude McCulloch is the author of Blue Army: Paramilitary Policing in Australia (Melbourne University Press, 2001)

 

 

 

 

 

CityState - Melbourne - July 20th 2002.

SPIES, 9 - 11 AND EVERYDAY LIFE

Jude McCulloch, Jenny Hocking, Angela Mitropoulos

9-11 has dramatically altered the terrain of surveillance technologies, laws, and practices. In this panel, Jude McCulloch considers the expansion of the military and policing existent in everyday life before and after 9-11.

Jenny Hocking looks at the relationship between the state and terror since 911. Angela Mitropoulos discusses surveillance as less a collection of technologies which might infringe upon the private spaces of its citizens lives, than the surveying of movements of bodies in and through heavily partitioned spaces, including the geopolitical enclosures of the nation-state. (article 1)

http://www.melbourne.indymedia.org/local/webcast/uploads/metafiles
/citystate2002_3a.mp3

Following MP3 was recorded during CityState Melbourne.

It has been compiled by Alternative Radio (Aust). If you are going to use this recording in a way that generates an income - you should make a contribution to Alternative Radio (Aust)... Track them down via www.3cr.org.au

http://www.citystate.org/



Terrorism and drugs

 

Media Awareness Project

 

UK: Legalise All Drugs Worldwide, Says Mowlam

 


Flash cartoon: LAW enforcement in the USA

The Real Threat
By Mark Fiore | September 23, 2002

 

 

URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v02.n1763.a02.html
Newshawk: M & M Family
Pubdate: Thu, 19 Sep 2002
Source: Guardian, The (UK)
Copyright: 2002 Guardian Newspapers Limited
Contact: letters@guardian.co.uk
Website: http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardian/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/175
Author: Patrick Wintour, chief political correspondent
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization)

LEGALISE ALL DRUGS WORLDWIDE, SAYS MOWLAM

Mo Mowlam, the former cabinet minister responsible for drugs policy, is calling for the international legalisation of the drugs trade as part of a more effective drive to combat terrorism.

Writing in the Guardian today, Ms Mowlam says: "Rather than bombing civilians in various Muslim countries, the United States and Britain should begin to take a more intelligent approach to the international drugs trade, namely to legalise it internationally."

Ms Mowlam, already an advocate of the legalisation of cannabis in Britain, is unlikely to find her latest proposal embraced by Downing Street but she will find support from some drugs specialists, who believe the battle to stop trafficking, with its inextricable links with terrorism, cannot succeed through mere suppression.

In her article she joins another ex-cabinet minister, Chris Smith, in questioning the need to topple Saddam Hussein, arguing instead that an effort to neutralise the illegal trade will do more to win the war against terrorism.

She points out that the international drugs trade is estimated to be worth around $400bn a year, representing about 8% of world trade.  She suggests that legalisation and regulation of the trade, requiring international action, will isolate the terrorists.

She also cites Republicans within the US administration, some of them in the state department, who admit that terrorist groups are increasingly using drug trafficking as a source of revenue.

She writes: "Drugs and terrorism are linked and are set to become more so.  Legalisation of drugs would stop this connection: it would begin to solve many of the problems caused by drugs today and would isolate the terrorists".

Ms Mowlam stood down as MP for Redcar last year, partly due to her frustration at the government's slowness in moving to a softer line on drugs issues. 

MAP posted-by: Doc-Hawk

<< Prev Area Author Email Index Print Source Translate Comment Next >>
Prev CN BC: Editorial: Council Blew This Decision Get The Facts
DrugWarFacts.org
Next UK: OPED: Fight Terror: Legalise The Drugs Trade
Latest Top 100 Stories Opinions Queue Disclaimer Donate
Home Resources Listserves Chat Guest Book Feedback Links

Media Awareness Project
Porterville, CA 93258
(800) 266-5759
Contact: Mark Greer mailto:mgreer@mapinc.org
Webmaster: Matt Elrod mailto:webmaster@mapinc.org

 

 

 

 

Rage against the
War on Drugs

by Nicolette Naxalite

"Fundamentalist" Muslims aside, there's nothing more likely to manipulate public opinion, whip up social hysteria and sell newspapers than the mass media's horror stories of the drug scourge.

Everyday we are confronted with 'real life' stories of sickly eyed, syringe wielding, granny rolling junkies; tracksuit clad, ram raiding, blunt toking potheads and underweight, cocaine-addled superstars losing it in public.

The War on Drugs (W.O.D) is nothing more than a cleverly disguised profit generating exercise, utilized by Propagandists and Moralists in a bid to alienate and coopt our diverse communities using history's oldest military tactic, divide and conquer.

Public fear generated by the War On Drugs serves well in its purpose to perpetuate racist stereotypes (Black = Crack...

...Asian = Smack) and reinforce the ridiculous notion that we need the police to "protect" us.

Drug users are relegated as being morally deficient people who don't deserve the same rights and respect as their stereotypically 'honest and clean living' counterparts.  

Despite violating one of capitalism's fundamental mantras,'Freedom of choice' (especially where our own bodies are concerned) WOD/Zero Tolerance/Prohibition ideals seem to mistakably assume that our societies, neither like, nor want drugs. Despite the overwhelming evidence that humanity has had a penchant for altered states of consciousness for eons.

The WOD dictates we live under occupation conditions, with the ever present, very real threat of latex-fisted Robo Cops randomly kicking down our doors, rifling through our personal effects, monitoring our phone lines, searching and beating us on the street, covertly infiltrating our social circles, confiscating our possessions, restricting our freedom of movement, incarcerating and murdering us.  All for our own good of course.

 

 

 

We all know the WOD can never be won. As do those who push its rhetoric and agenda for their own benefit.

What would happen to our society...

...To those condescending social workers in cushy jobs? Brutally uncaring cops and screws? Bored, alcohol-swilling magistrates? Vote hungry, fear campaigning political parasites and talk-back storm-troopers of moral hypocrisy? If they had no-one to patronize, victimize and exploit?   

The WOD  and it's consequences involve us all. It is our friends and family who will continue to be the casualties, vilified and persecuted as criminals. 

Reclaim YOUR liberties DEMAND...

...The immediate, unconditional legalization of ALL drugs...

...The abolishment of state,federal and international drug enforcement agencies, law courts, incarceration corporations and industrial/military complexes, all of whom directly rely on profits from the WOD and the International drug trade.

...The redirection of all monies wasted on the WOD into international education and medical services.                                                                        
...Perpetrators of crimes against humanity in the WOD  surrender and be prosecuted as War Criminals                                                                                                                
...Victims of the WOD be acknowledged and adequately compensated

...The immediate release of all prisoners of the WOD

...NOW!

 

 

Back to
BIAS

 


NAP homepage

Latest NAPNT news Latest NT drug news About NAP Current campaign Media alerts
Events NAP in the media Health info
for drug users
Images Search napnt.org Site map
Contact NAP

NAP email list Articles Donate Links Retractable
syringes


AIVL


map06_23.gif

PARIAH